Antsa Razafimbelo
Chair
Sustainable development
About
Assessing a public policy, a programme or a major project takes weeks of work. The sources are numerous, heterogeneous and often written in several languages. In the end, an appraisal founded on a few passages does not hold before a funder who asks what it rests upon.
Assessing a policy or a project is slow, costly and hard to defend. Above all, most assessments blend what is measurable with what is a matter of judgement: fact can no longer be told apart from appraisal.
Not the best appraisal, but an appraisal whose origin can be explained. An engine that abstains from concluding when the material is lacking is more useful than an engine that always concludes.
We do not produce a single overall grade. We do not perform causal inference: Themiros assesses, it does not explain causes. We do not replace the evaluator.
An engine that refuses to conclude when the corpus is insufficient is more useful than an engine that always concludes.
The team
Chair
Sustainable development
Chief Executive Officer
Climate resilience
Thirty minutes suffice to assess whether the method corresponds to what you must produce.